There are truths too perilous to politicize, and yet too dangerous to ignore. Extrajudicial killings. Vigilantism. Terror dressed as justice.
These are not aberrations of governance; they are desecrations. They hollow out the fragile covenant that separates civilization from blood feud.
I will risk the obvious: violence without trial is not justice, it is barbarism draped in a flag.
The rule of law, the discipline of due process, the flawed machinery of democracy—these are not partisan artifacts. They are the frail scaffolds holding back the abyss. They are the difference between inhabiting a society and surviving in a ruin.
And I will risk another truth, harder to swallow for many of you: Charlie Kirk, God rest his soul, was a vile scumbag of a human being. But I would rather live in a world with him still in it than in one where bullets become the arbiter of political ends. I would rather endure the noise of voices I despise than inherit the silence left by blood. For when enemies fall to extrajudicial violence, we do not inherit victory, we inherit barbarism.
How we arrived here is no great mystery. Our leaders have made fire into sacrament. Our sitting President has not merely excused violence but worshipped it—singing its praises, fantasizing about executions, envisioning generals shot at dawn. He joked of journalists raped in prison. He mused about killings as though they were policy options. And then he made good on those fantasies: Venezuelan sailors cut down at sea, their deaths justified with the thinnest of pretexts. When the President dreams in blood, the nation inherits his nightmares.
But the rot does not end at one man. He pardoned more than a thousand insurrectionists on the very first day of his second term, rewarding the hands that battered police officers and shattered windows and far worse. Governors like Greg Abbott followed suit, washing Daniel Perry clean after he choked a man to death on the subway. Matt Gaetz announced to fairgoers that only force could cleanse Washington. Trump’s own lawyer declared that a cybersecurity official should be “drawn and quartered.” Louie Gohmert, after losing a lawsuit, told supporters the only remaining recourse was to “be as violent as Antifa.”
This is not leadership. It is incantation. Each utterance is a permission structure, psychological corridors leading ordinary citizens into extraordinary cruelty, whispering: your violence will be sanctified.
James Baldwin warned us: “People who shut their eyes to reality simply invite their own destruction, and anyone who insists on remaining in a state of innocence long after that innocence is dead turns himself into a monster.” Monsters, then, are exactly what we have raised up, crowned, and let loose.
The results are not abstract. They echo in the chants of Proud Boys calling for executions, in Parler comments demanding that police be beaten until they cannot return to their families. They manifest in pipe bombs planted outside the RNC and DNC, in the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, in the hammer crushing Paul Pelosi’s skull in his own home, in assassination attempts against both President Trump and Democrats, in the bloodied bodies of Melissa Hortman and her husband, in the murder of Brian Thompson by Luigi Mangione (allegedly), in today's brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Researchers call this “contagion.” I call it liturgy. A gospel of violence preached from pulpits of power, taken up in choirs of rage, written into the marrow of a country that once swore it was built on laws, not men.
But if there is liturgy in violence, there is also liturgy in resistance. If you're religious, scripture itself cuts against this false gospel: “Put your sword back in its place, for all who draw the sword will die by the sword” (Matthew 26:52). “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God” (Romans 12:19). The Torah insists: “I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live” (Deuteronomy 30:19). Even the Bhagavad-Gita whispers across centuries: “You have a right to your actions, but never to your actions' fruits" (2.47).
These words, if taken seriously, dismantle the sanctification of vengeance. They strip away the mask of righteousness from the bloodlust of the crowd. They remind us that justice is measured in fidelity to principle, not intoxication with retribution.
And so, beneath the mourning and the smoke, I refuse to surrender to despair. There remains something unbroken, though it trembles: the thread of covenant that binds us still. Not to a party. Not to a politician. But to each other. To the belief that disputes are to be settled not with the bullet but with the ballot, not by terror but by law.
I will do my best to insist upon it like an incantation: The rule of law belongs to no ideology. Due process belongs to no side.
Democracy belongs to us all, or not at all.
Those who revel in violence cannot inherit the earth. They inherit only ashes. It is we—the exhausted, the wounded, the unbroken—who must claim another inheritance: A society where justice is slow but real, fragile but sacred, where life is not determined at the end of a gun, and where the covenant of law still whispers: you are safe here, even when you disagree.
We are not yet beyond saving. But the time for silence is over. Our choice is plain: covenant or chaos, law or lynching, a society of flawed mercy or one of endless graves. And in that choice lies the only hope fierce enough to bind us again.